Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Ingin membahas hal-hal umum mengenai mobil dan otomotif, silakan bahas disini...

Moderators: Ryan Steele, sh00t, r12qiSonH4ji, avantgardebronze, akbarfit

octafiantos
Member of Mechanic Engineer
Member of Mechanic Engineer
Posts: 1451
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:10
Location: Hanoi
Daily Vehicle: xebushanoi-18

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by octafiantos »

E36 berat 1560 ambil data dari mana btw. Itu udah deket ke curb weightnya E39, 16xx kg. E36 itu enteng cuma 1300an/start dari 2600lbs seingat saya. E39 itu mobilnya super berat, kaki beda total, control arm depan aja dobel. Dek yang diinjak penumpang bukan dek yang keliatan dari bawah, ada lapisan lagi. Dimensi bodi beda 20cm+ pasti beda material logamnya banyak, jok, motor jok dll.

Sent from my 2014817 using Tapatalk
Kavling kosong, bisa dikridit.
vp920b
New Member of Mechanic Engineer
New Member of Mechanic Engineer
Posts: 1060
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:41

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by vp920b »

Just sharing dulu saya pernah pakai Toyota AE82 di aussie hatchback yang GTi 4AGE engine Bluetop.

Saya beli karena dulu sempet bankrupt pas sekolah dan akhirnya butuh uang kerja sisa beli mobil ini. Saya beli ke gunung jauh jauh, dan jujur ga rugi sih. Ni mobil enteng less than 850KG kayanya, mesin bisa ngerev kaya Honda S2K 9rb RPM dan suaranya indah banget..

Kalau ngomong fun to drive, semakin enteng tuh mobil, power 100HP aja dah cukup koq, kenceng pula malahan. 0-100 ngalahin mobil 1.5L masa kini, sekitar 8ish second tuh AE82, tahun 1985, which is older than me..

Tapi dilain sisi, mobil yang well balance kaya Subaru Legacy gen 1 RS saya juga fun to drive banget. 200ish HP, turbo EJ20 engine, suspension pke pedders spring dan koni shock, langsung beloknya sadis banget pke ban Kumho semi slick.. Enak abis buat cornering, keluar corner gas narik banget.. Sayang ga ada uang dulu ane ga benerin synchromesh 2nd gear yang uda rusak, jadi kalau gigi 1 ke 2 harus pelan pelan ganti giginya..

But lightweight car emang fun sih.. Mobil jaman sekarang berat berat, nikung jadi ga enak.. Fun arti buat saya adalah tidak perlu kenceng gila, tapi pas tikungan itu bisa cepat dan nikmat, kaya naik motor sembari kneedown kaya rossi.. Nah itu fun.. hehe
jivos
Member of Mechanic Engineer
Member of Mechanic Engineer
Posts: 1960
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:04
Location: jkt

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by jivos »

Thx comment2nya,
banyak hal baru yg di dpt. different opinion soal lightweight are welcomed, Agree/disagree ambil positipnya sj.

Ngebahas "lightweight" ini sekalian buat rethinking thd mbl yg kita ato org2 sering sebut sbg mbl ok.

If a lighweight car with a decent horsepower (mostly also more cheaper) can do, accelerate, handle, or giving xcitement as good as or even better than those, then.....the choice is all up to u.

Utk konsep fun to drive n korelasinya dg lightweight, dr bbrp artikel luaran, ini yg agak mengena penjelasannya (pernah dikutip jg o om chriss di mari)
..... These are the distinct characteristics in cars that have made them enjoyable n fun to drive.

1. Agility and Nimbleness
Cars are enormous masses. These masses don’t want to change direction (says Newton), so when you drive something that allows for quick direction changes it’s exciting. Several factors play a large role here, though a lot of it comes down to weight. Think of it like this: if someone rolls a basketball at you, it’s very easy to stop it and roll it back. If someone rolls a bowling ball at you, you’re probably just going to get out of the way. Stopping it takes a lot of work, and the same applies to cars. These factors (among others) help improve agility:

Moment of inertia: ideally weight is centered;
Weight balance: ideally weight is distributed fairly evenly between the two axles;
Low weight: shed those pounds!

2. Steering
I believe response time plays a large role in how we appreciate steering systems. If you turn the wheel and you immediately have the car turn in, you believe it to be better. Regardless of whether that translates into better lap times is irrelevant, the fact you feel more in tune with the car instantly makes it more fun to drive. A few factors help keep steering fun:

Steering ratio: smaller ratios result in quicker turn in and a sense of better response. I find this desirable;
Feedback: Cars with a mechanical linkage between the wheel and the tyres with minimal assist will provide the driver with useful feedback about how the front tyres are behaving;
Low weight: Cars that have less weight will turn more easily, and this results in better steering feel as you don’t feel like you’re fighting against an invisible force.

3. Predictability and Controllability
Ultimately we want to drive cars that don’t understeer or oversteer, unless initiated intentionally. For the car to behave neutrally, many factors play a role:

Weight distribution and balance: centered weight helps provide neutral steering;
Suspension/wheel/tyre tuning: balancing front and rear loading and grip is a complicated endeavour, but when done correctly, it makes driving incredibly entertaining.

4. Approachable Limit
Perhaps a generalisation, but I’d be willing to bet the majority of car enthusiasts don’t spend a high portion of their time on a track. For most of us, we experience the joy of driving on public roads. When the ability of a car exceeds what is safely possible to achieve as a law abiding citizen, how useful is it really? I’ve never driven anything truly exotic, but I imagine that, on public roads, it feels similar to being a tiger looking at a tasty meal on the other side of protective glass at the zoo. To have some real fun with hyper-powered cars, you need to be on a track.

Light weight cars with skinny tyres tend to be incredibly fun on public roads. You can feel - and hear - as the limit approaches and step over that line if you want to, letting the tail slide out if that’s your thing. There’s something deeply enjoyable about having the rear tyres get loose while controlling the path of the vehicle. Cars on diets tend to allow for this to happen easily and predictably. I’m not advocating drifting on public roads, but having a ride that allows you to flirt with the idea is spectacular.

5. G-forces
Here’s where 0-60mph does comes in, albeit along with many other factors. G-forces are sensations we’re not usually subjected to (other than the one holding you down), so when you add in lateral forces to the mix it’s thrilling. Rollercoasters, merry-go-rounds, Gravitrons… these are all simple devices that subject us to g-forces, and we pay to experience it. We want cars that brake, corner, and accelerate quickly. The physics of what provides this is simple

based on the five above factors which I believe are critical to a car being fun to drive, there’s a common link: weight. That’s unfortunate, because it’s become standard for cars to be heavy these days.

As weight increases, fun dies. It has such a huge impact: efficiency, braking, acceleration, handling. Everything gets better when weight is reduced, yet it doesn’t seem to be a focal point of car culture. Cars like the BRZ and Miata are overlooked simply because they’re ‘underpowered’, when really they’re brilliant machines maximising fun per dollar spent; the Alfa Romeo 4C and Lotus Elise also follow this design philosophy.
Source: https://www.carthrottle.com/post/engine ... -to-drive/

Btt sharing bobot ah
A3 1.8T 20v : 150hp/210nm 1.150kg
SS : 136/160nm 1.048kg
E60 523 pre fl: 173hp/ beneren eike ngga tau bobotnya :ungg:
4 wheels move the body, 2 wheels move the soul.
kykyhalim
Full Member of Junior Mechanic
Full Member of Junior Mechanic
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:35

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by kykyhalim »

Sy melihat disini definisi fun to drive sendiri adalah masih sangat subjektif.. tergantung dilihat dari sudut pandang yg mana.. ada yg mendeskripsikan bahwa fun to drive harus lah ringan parameter utamanya.. ada juga yg melihat kenyamanan dan keamanan ketika mobil dipacu menjadi parameter utama dari overall fun to drive nya (contoh nyatanya mobil lebih "jejek" di jalan tol dan tidak melayang ketika dikebut).

Imho.. Menurut saya, unsur fun to drive dari sebuah mbl yg paling utama adalah sangat berkaitan dng hukum fisika tentang pusat gravitasi.. dimana semakin rendah titik gravitasi sebuah mbl akan menghasilkan stabilitas dan dinamika yg semakin baik dan akan semakin fun to drive.. dan menurut sy berat dan ringannya sebuah mbl masih dapat dikompensasi dng rekayakasa engineering yg dapat menghasilkan power to weight ratio yg ideal (asal jangan kelewatan aja sampai terlalu berat bgt kayak mobil kepresidenan us yg tahan peluru dan granat berat nya berton ton ya mau hp nya besar sama aja boong)

Dan mengutip kalimat om motomobi.. saya suka turbo.. buat sy pribadi sensasi gaya G yg dihasilkan oleh turbo juga merupakan peran yg menyumbang rasa fun to drive.. :)
nimoo
Full Member of Senior Mechanic
Full Member of Senior Mechanic
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 14:13
Location: Jakarta
Daily Vehicle: nmax

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by nimoo »

ford everest 2005 WLT,
121hp @3500rpm; 262Nm @2000rpm

dengan berat 2600kg jadi terasa boyo sangat
User avatar
fatmike21
New Member of Senior Mechanic
New Member of Senior Mechanic
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:56
Location: Lereng Merapi, Sleman, Jogja

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by fatmike21 »

ChZ wrote:Honda HR-V 1.8 CVT : 1.3XXkg, 139HP / 169Nm
Honda Civic 1.8 AT : 1.3xx kg, 141HP / 174Nm
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport : 1.4xx kg, 150HP / 190Nm
Toyota Avanza Veloz AT : 1.1xx kg, 104HP / errr lupa .... 13x Nm sepertinya.
Suzuki Ertiga GL AT : 1.2xx kg, 92HP/130Nm.
Toyota Harrier 240G AT : 1.7xx kg, 160HP / lupa.

Banyakan lupa angka torsi malah :big_slap:

Ini loh kenapa saya dari dulu paling gak setuju kalau dibilang fun to drive itu relatif... Kalo fun to drive relatif, ya kenapa harus repot-repot engineering mikir susah-susah? Kenapa sih BMW sampe mempertahankan pake penggerak RWD yang kuno dan gak efisien di sedan-sedan sportnya lalu harus repot mikir bobot sasisnya harus seringan apa karena RWD sendiri pasti lebih berat dari FWD. Kok kesannya BMW itu "bodoh" karena mempersulit diri sendiri dengan design layout RWD sehingga harus mikir keras cara ngurangin bobot sasis. Kenapa gak bikin BMW M3 atau M4 FWD aja? Kan enak, irit, ringan... fun to drive kan relatif jd bodo amat.

"cut"
RWD dibilang kuno LOL.... mana ada GT & supercar FWD? kasihan ya yg punya GTO, AMG GT, LFA, Vette, Viper dibilang kuno, gak sekalian F1 pakai FWD biar irit, kencang & ringan? LOL No torque no fun
"straight 6 forever"
User avatar
ChZ
SM Specialist
SM Specialist
Posts: 16676
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 14:30
Location: Semarang
Daily Vehicle: Civic FK4

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by ChZ »

fatmike21 wrote:
RWD dibilang kuno LOL.... mana ada GT & supercar FWD? kasihan ya yg punya GTO, AMG GT, LFA, Vette, Viper dibilang kuno, gak sekalian F1 pakai FWD biar irit, kencang & ringan? LOL No torque no fun
Baca yang lengkap donk kalimatnya.... Baca kok separo-separo....

LOL emang kenyataannya layout drivetrain RWD itu sudah dari jaman dahulu kala dan dianggap "tidak efisien" ... makanya sekarang banyak yang beralih ke FWD karena lebih efisien.

On the bright side, nah ini yang saya berusaha sampaikan. Mobil RWD dianggap lebih "fun" dibanding FWD .... karena kenyataan RWD dengan decent power bisa powerslide di tikungan. Natur seorang petrolhead pasti lebih menyukai oversteer dibanding understeer. FWD on the other side, sangat - sangat rawan understeer kalau powernya terlalu besar. Solusinya adalah pabrikan sekarang harus ngakalin front-diff buat ngurangin resiko understeer. Contoh paling brilian adalah VW Golf GTI MK.7 yang sangat dipuji-puji even oleh Clarkson karena kepresisiannya di tikungan.

Makanya kenapa RWD yang "kuno" ini tetep dipertahankan. Saya bener bener gak ada niat untuk jelekin RWD, tapi kenyataannya memang begitu. Lah wong BMW sendiri aja sekarang udah beralih ke FWD buat mobil jalan raya nya....
1997 E39 M52B28
2017 FK4 L15B7
User avatar
fatmike21
New Member of Senior Mechanic
New Member of Senior Mechanic
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:56
Location: Lereng Merapi, Sleman, Jogja

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by fatmike21 »

ChZ wrote:
fatmike21 wrote:
RWD dibilang kuno LOL.... mana ada GT & supercar FWD? kasihan ya yg punya GTO, AMG GT, LFA, Vette, Viper dibilang kuno, gak sekalian F1 pakai FWD biar irit, kencang & ringan? LOL No torque no fun
Baca yang lengkap donk kalimatnya.... Baca kok separo-separo....

LOL emang kenyataannya layout drivetrain RWD itu sudah dari jaman dahulu kala dan dianggap "tidak efisien" ... makanya sekarang banyak yang beralih ke FWD karena lebih efisien.

On the bright side, nah ini yang saya berusaha sampaikan. Mobil RWD dianggap lebih "fun" dibanding FWD .... karena kenyataan RWD dengan decent power bisa powerslide di tikungan. Natur seorang petrolhead pasti lebih menyukai oversteer dibanding understeer. FWD on the other side, sangat - sangat rawan understeer kalau powernya terlalu besar. Solusinya adalah pabrikan sekarang harus ngakalin front-diff buat ngurangin resiko understeer. Contoh paling brilian adalah VW Golf GTI MK.7 yang sangat dipuji-puji even oleh Clarkson karena kepresisiannya di tikungan.

Makanya kenapa RWD yang "kuno" ini tetep dipertahankan. Saya bener bener gak ada niat untuk jelekin RWD, tapi kenyataannya memang begitu. Lah wong BMW sendiri aja sekarang udah beralih ke FWD buat mobil jalan raya nya....
oke kalau jalan raya memang lebih efisien & murah FWD (FWD economy car not performa), but kalau mobil performa tinggi ya gak mungkin pakai FWD apalagi mobil Luxury yang dicari kenyamanan berkendaranya walaupun HP & torsi segede gaban. Dan ini kesalahan mobil Full Lux Acura, mana bisa bersaing sama kompetitornya (mesin hanya V6 FWD & AWD) :big_peace:
"straight 6 forever"
User avatar
ChZ
SM Specialist
SM Specialist
Posts: 16676
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 14:30
Location: Semarang
Daily Vehicle: Civic FK4

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by ChZ »

fatmike21 wrote: oke kalau jalan raya memang lebih efisien & murah FWD (FWD economy car not performa), but kalau mobil performa tinggi ya gak mungkin pakai FWD apalagi mobil Luxury yang dicari kenyamanan berkendaranya walaupun HP & torsi segede gaban. Dan ini kesalahan mobil Full Lux Acura, mana bisa bersaing sama kompetitornya (mesin hanya V6 FWD & AWD) :big_peace:
Loh iya, siapa bilang saya jelekin RWD loh.... Saya bilang dua duanya punya plus minus... Kuno cuma masalah gak efisien dan memang sudah berumur saja. Kenapa sih kuno selalu konotasinya negatif... Padahal jam dinding kuno aja buat penggemar barang antik rela keluarin kocek lebih dalem dibanding beli jam dinding baru...

Makanya butuh pemikiran yang kompleks bikin mobil RWD ringan... Dan contoh yang paling berhasil adalah Mazda MX-5 (sekali lagi)... mobil RWD tapi bobotnya cuma selevel hatchback FWD... Bisa bayangin seberapa ringan sasisnya MX-5?

Avanza bodinya tipis aja bobotnya masih berat...
1997 E39 M52B28
2017 FK4 L15B7
User avatar
fatmike21
New Member of Senior Mechanic
New Member of Senior Mechanic
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:56
Location: Lereng Merapi, Sleman, Jogja

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by fatmike21 »

ChZ wrote:
fatmike21 wrote: oke kalau jalan raya memang lebih efisien & murah FWD (FWD economy car not performa), but kalau mobil performa tinggi ya gak mungkin pakai FWD apalagi mobil Luxury yang dicari kenyamanan berkendaranya walaupun HP & torsi segede gaban. Dan ini kesalahan mobil Full Lux Acura, mana bisa bersaing sama kompetitornya (mesin hanya V6 FWD & AWD) :big_peace:
Loh iya, siapa bilang saya jelekin RWD loh.... Saya bilang dua duanya punya plus minus... Kuno cuma masalah gak efisien dan memang sudah berumur saja. Kenapa sih kuno selalu konotasinya negatif... Padahal jam dinding kuno aja buat penggemar barang antik rela keluarin kocek lebih dalem dibanding beli jam dinding baru...

Makanya butuh pemikiran yang kompleks bikin mobil RWD ringan... Dan contoh yang paling berhasil adalah Mazda MX-5 (sekali lagi)... mobil RWD tapi bobotnya cuma selevel hatchback FWD... Bisa bayangin seberapa ringan sasisnya MX-5?

Avanza bodinya tipis aja bobotnya masih berat...
Roadster vs LMPV gak sekalian avanza vs lotus? LOL....... kebanyakan roadster memang di design seperti itu. Body ringan dengan mesin output kecil itu dilihat dari sisi mobilnya untuk apa. Menurut saya layout itu disesuaikan dengan mobil dan kegunaannya... :ngacir:
"straight 6 forever"
User avatar
ChZ
SM Specialist
SM Specialist
Posts: 16676
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 14:30
Location: Semarang
Daily Vehicle: Civic FK4

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by ChZ »

fatmike21 wrote:
Roadster vs LMPV gak sekalian avanza vs lotus? LOL....... kebanyakan roadster memang di design seperti itu. Body ringan dengan mesin output kecil itu dilihat dari sisi mobilnya untuk apa. Menurut saya layout itu disesuaikan dengan mobil dan kegunaannya... :ngacir:
Leh... memang cuma buat membandingkan saja dari segi bobot mobil RWD ... Cuma mau memperjelas kalo saya gak bilang RWD jelek. Saya ya tau bandingin roadster dan MPV memang gak sejenis. Just saying, how Mazda engineers are genius to make super-light roadsters without comply with the extra weight from RWD layout.... Because not even Euros can... SLK berat tuh.

Terus gua ntar dibilang "Roadster eropa jangan dibandingin sama MX5 blablabla" .... salah lagi dah gua.

Susah ye jelasinnya.
1997 E39 M52B28
2017 FK4 L15B7
User avatar
b8099ok
SM Specialist
SM Specialist
Posts: 2794
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:14
Location: Jakarta
Daily Vehicle: 2020 All New Xpander Pickup

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by b8099ok »

Mbah fatmike mobilnya apa? :big_blushing:
FWD + FWD + 4WD + 4WD = :big_cat:
ricz
New Member of Mechanic Master
New Member of Mechanic Master
Posts: 12277
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:18
Location: Indonesia

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by ricz »

b8099ok wrote:Mbah fatmike mobilnya apa? :big_blushing:
Dakar diskonan :mky_02:

Current :
2012 AGL10
2013 RM3
2021 GUN165
User avatar
fatmike21
New Member of Senior Mechanic
New Member of Senior Mechanic
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:56
Location: Lereng Merapi, Sleman, Jogja

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by fatmike21 »

b8099ok wrote:Mbah fatmike mobilnya apa? :big_blushing:
mobil RWD tua dan bodoh om.... :big_childish:
"straight 6 forever"
User avatar
808BB
New Member of Senior Mechanic
New Member of Senior Mechanic
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:53
Location: Bandar Lampung, Lampung
Daily Vehicle: ANH30 FJA300

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by 808BB »

ChZ wrote:
fatmike21 wrote:
Roadster vs LMPV gak sekalian avanza vs lotus? LOL....... kebanyakan roadster memang di design seperti itu. Body ringan dengan mesin output kecil itu dilihat dari sisi mobilnya untuk apa. Menurut saya layout itu disesuaikan dengan mobil dan kegunaannya... :ngacir:
Leh... memang cuma buat membandingkan saja dari segi bobot mobil RWD ... Cuma mau memperjelas kalo saya gak bilang RWD jelek. Saya ya tau bandingin roadster dan MPV memang gak sejenis. Just saying, how Mazda engineers are genius to make super-light roadsters without comply with the extra weight from RWD layout.... Because not even Euros can... SLK berat tuh.

Terus gua ntar dibilang "Roadster eropa jangan dibandingin sama MX5 blablabla" .... salah lagi dah gua.

Susah ye jelasinnya.
Secara size juga udah beda, ya wajar berat :big_smile]
GGL15 Obsidian
F30 Havana
KE5FW Soul red
ANH30 White pearl
J300 Precious white
User avatar
ChZ
SM Specialist
SM Specialist
Posts: 16676
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 14:30
Location: Semarang
Daily Vehicle: Civic FK4

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by ChZ »

808BB wrote: Secara size juga udah beda, ya wajar berat :big_smile]
Wuih hai bob lama gak nongol :big_peace: :ngacir: ah pengguna SLKnya udah dateng
1997 E39 M52B28
2017 FK4 L15B7
User avatar
808BB
New Member of Senior Mechanic
New Member of Senior Mechanic
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:53
Location: Bandar Lampung, Lampung
Daily Vehicle: ANH30 FJA300

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by 808BB »

ChZ wrote:
808BB wrote: Secara size juga udah beda, ya wajar berat :big_smile]
Wuih hai bob lama gak nongol :big_peace: :ngacir:

Halo cris, liat di signature clbk sama brand yang dulu ya?
:mky_03:
GGL15 Obsidian
F30 Havana
KE5FW Soul red
ANH30 White pearl
J300 Precious white
User avatar
ChZ
SM Specialist
SM Specialist
Posts: 16676
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 14:30
Location: Semarang
Daily Vehicle: Civic FK4

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by ChZ »

808BB wrote:
ChZ wrote:
808BB wrote: Secara size juga udah beda, ya wajar berat :big_smile]
Wuih hai bob lama gak nongol :big_peace: :ngacir:

Halo cris, liat di signature clbk sama brand yang dulu ya?
:mky_03:
Ah.... Bukan CLBK. Dari dulu kan emang garasi oeh gak pernah lepas dari brand ini :big_biglaugh:

Mau selingkuh kemanapun, ujung-ujungnya ya tetep ada satu dua biji.... :big_slap:

Mau selingkuh ke M malah batal deal padahal barangnya tinggal ambil udah dibayar :big_slap: gegara salah tipe
1997 E39 M52B28
2017 FK4 L15B7
User avatar
fatmike21
New Member of Senior Mechanic
New Member of Senior Mechanic
Posts: 135
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:56
Location: Lereng Merapi, Sleman, Jogja

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by fatmike21 »

808BB wrote: Secara size juga udah beda, ya wajar berat :big_smile]
Jawaban simple dan jelas... :big_exellent:
"straight 6 forever"
User avatar
b8099ok
SM Specialist
SM Specialist
Posts: 2794
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:14
Location: Jakarta
Daily Vehicle: 2020 All New Xpander Pickup

Re: Share: Lightweight/bobot kendaraan

Post by b8099ok »

fatmike21 wrote:
b8099ok wrote:Mbah fatmike mobilnya apa? :big_blushing:
mobil RWD tua dan bodoh om.... :big_childish:
Sama donk,...
Uwe msh piara gren ektra,... 7k is de bes,... (in term of fuel brutality :big_slap: )
FWD + FWD + 4WD + 4WD = :big_cat: